BETA · GAMMA-Ray is published for review. The rules, the mapping and every rating here are experimental and will change. How a rating is made · what exists · send a correction
GAMMA-Rayv0.0.155 · beta

Microsoft: 200: Repeatable, Organization and culture

Provision ms.200.5.2 · Agentic AI adoption maturity model · characteristic

Unclear roles and adoption ownership

The text is as taken from the source. In the source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/agents/adoption-maturity-model/ (the document: its publisher gives no deeper address for this item; linked 2026-11-10). The instrument: Agentic AI adoption maturity model, Microsoft's; quoted briefly with the source; read 2026-11-09.

Who cites it

IndicatorThe fact it asks forKind of linkThe assertion
I30Each agent has a named ownernegation: its absenceAsserted in the mapping by gamma-ray@web-summit.dinis; the written basis is not recorded yet.
I33Roles and responsibilities for AI risk are documentednegation: its absenceAsserted in the mapping by gamma-ray@web-summit.dinis; the written basis is not recorded yet.

A link is our assertion, not the instrument's. "Same" carries the evidence to the provision in full. "Part" marks the provision as partly evidenced: the fact is one piece of what it asks. "Negation" points the other way.

The evidence that reaches it

CardThroughThis provision isThe evidenceHow far to trust it
RiskMandate PublisherI30its absenceSourceπ Moderate · S1·R5·A1 ×2
The PrompTugal.news agent teamI30its absenceSourceπ Moderate · S1·R5·A1 ×2
The PrompTugal.news agent teamI33its absenceSourceπ Moderate · S1·R5·A1 ×2
Spinnable AI employeesI30its absence"A worker's manager can administer its settings" Sourceπ Moderate · S1·R5·A1 ×3

Touched never means complies.

Answer it directly

A company can answer this line item itself, in its own file at /.well-known/fact-ray.json, with the node gamma-ray:provision/ms.200.5.2 (how). A company that already assesses itself against Microsoft can reuse that work.

All provisions