# Microsoft: 200: Repeatable, Organization and culture

> GAMMA-Ray v0.0.155 (beta, for review; every rating is experimental). One line item of Agentic AI adoption maturity model (ms.200.5.2): its text, its place in the source, the indicators that cite it and the evidence that reaches it.
> Page: https://gamma-ray.sgit.ai/provisions/ms.200.5.2/ · Source: data/provisions.json


Provision ms.200.5.2 · Agentic AI adoption maturity model · characteristic

> Unclear roles and adoption ownership

The text is as taken from the source. **In the source:** [https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/agents/adoption-maturity-model/](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/agents/adoption-maturity-model/) (the document: its publisher gives no deeper address for this item; linked 2026-11-10). The instrument: [Agentic AI adoption maturity model](../../instruments/index.md), Microsoft's; quoted briefly with the source; read 2026-11-09.

## Who cites it

| Indicator | The fact it asks for | Kind of link | The assertion |
|---|---|---|---|
| [`I30`](../../questions/index.md#I30) | Each agent has a named owner | negation: its absence | Asserted in the mapping by gamma-ray@web-summit.dinis; the written basis is not recorded yet. |
| [`I33`](../../questions/index.md#I33) | Roles and responsibilities for AI risk are documented | negation: its absence | Asserted in the mapping by gamma-ray@web-summit.dinis; the written basis is not recorded yet. |

A link is our assertion, not the instrument's. "Same" carries the evidence to the provision in full. "Part" marks the provision as partly evidenced: the fact is one piece of what it asks. "Negation" points the other way.

## The evidence that reaches it

| Card | Through | This provision is | The evidence | How far to trust it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [RiskMandate Publisher](../../spectrum/cards/riskmandate-publisher/index.md) | `I30` | its absence | [Source](https://riskmandate.ai/team/publisher.html) | π Moderate · S1·R5·A1 ×2 |
| [The PrompTugal.news agent team](../../spectrum/cards/promptugal-newsroom-team/index.md) | `I30` | its absence | [Source](https://promptugal.news/CLAUDE.md) | π Moderate · S1·R5·A1 ×2 |
| [The PrompTugal.news agent team](../../spectrum/cards/promptugal-newsroom-team/index.md) | `I33` | its absence | [Source](https://promptugal.news/CLAUDE.md) | π Moderate · S1·R5·A1 ×2 |
| [Spinnable AI employees](../../spectrum/cards/spinnable-ai-employees/index.md) | `I30` | its absence | "A worker's manager can administer its settings" [Source](https://docs.spinnable.ai/guides/change-manager) | π Moderate · S1·R5·A1 ×3 |

Touched never means complies.

## Answer it directly

A company can answer this line item itself, in its own file at `/.well-known/fact-ray.json`, with the node `gamma-ray:provision/ms.200.5.2` ([how](../../fact-ray/well-known/index.md)). A company that already assesses itself against Microsoft can reuse that work.

[All provisions](../../provisions/index.md)