BETA · GAMMA-Ray is published for review. The rules, the mapping and every rating here are experimental and will change. How a rating is made · what exists · send a correction
GAMMA-Rayv0.0.155 · beta

Ethiack

GAMMA-Ray report · Spectrum 0.2 beta · Public tier · read 2026-11-10 · not reviewed by the company yet

Ethiack sells an offensive security platform in which its AI agent, Hackian, maps an organisation's attack surface and tests it for exploitable vulnerabilities, alongside pentests that add human ethical hackers.

1solution carded
of 7 found
21sources captured
and hashed
42provisions lit
in 8 of 8 instruments
4examples of the agent
at work, with sources

Built only from Ethiack's own public pages and, for company basics only, the news sources named beside each fact. Ethiack has not seen this report. Nothing was tested and no credentials were used. If you are Ethiack and something here is wrong or missing, the correction will be made and dated, and you can claim the card to add evidence.

The agentic solutions

One card per solution. Each level is computed from the evidence by a published rule; a dimension with nothing public reads "not yet evidenced", which is not a no. A card rates a product as documented, not anyone's deployment of it.

Hackian (Ethiack's agentic AI pentesting engine)

AI agent that runs reconnaissance, exploits vulnerabilities with non-destructive routines and reports findings with proof of exploitation; used in Continuous Adversarial Exposure Validation and in Agentic Pentests (Swift, Depth).

Hackiana product, as documented
SPECTRUM 0.2 BETA · Public tier · 2026-11-10
A–Autonomynot yet evidenced
DraftStage: Exploring (4 of 16)In production

Standout. Reach 2 (Integrated): "Hackian continuously analyzes your entire attack surface in breadth"

Next unlock. Autonomy 3 (Acts): public evidence that the agent handles routine tasks; the person is consulted on exceptions would get there.

Trust. FACT-Ray: 12 facts: 12 π Moderate · found by an agent, captured and hashed, checked by 2 other agents (same model family, shared repository); no human has signed it.

Standards constellation. 42 provisions lit across 8 of 8 instruments.

Evidence: 11 sources, captured and hashed · the card's page has the vault's read key · Not reviewed by its vendor yet · correct or claim this card

The full card, every answer and its evidence · the governance layer

Continuous Adversarial Exposure Validation

Always-on test mode in which Hackian runs reconnaissance and broad vulnerability checks across the in-scope attack surface. No card yet (generally available): this solution has not been assessed.

Agentic Pentest (Swift, Depth)

On-demand, in-depth test of selected assets by Hackian, governed by a written policy with focus, goals and guardrails. No card yet (generally available): this solution has not been assessed.

Expert Pentest

Hackian-led pentest with human ethical hackers, scheduled with the Ethiack team. No card yet (generally available): this solution has not been assessed.

Ethiack Beacon

Customer-deployed tunnel that extends Hackian's testing into internal networks. No card yet (generally available): this solution has not been assessed.

Attack Surface Management

Continuous discovery and mapping of an organisation's assets. No card yet (generally available): this solution has not been assessed.

Ethiack Zero

Public, read-only feed of new vulnerabilities with Ethiack's check and exploit timings, over a REST API and a public MCP server. No card yet (public, free): this solution has not been assessed.

Our reading

The shape. Hackian, Ethiack's agentic AI pentesting engine, reads A– · R2 · C1 · O1 (Exploring), and every level holds as shipped. It runs reconnaissance across a customer's in-scope attack surface, confirms vulnerabilities with non-destructive exploitation routines and reports findings with proof. Once launched, an Agentic Pentest runs on its own, deciding in real time within the policy and scope the customer writes; findings and an activity log show its progress.

Where the evidence is strongest. Named customers on Ethiack's own pages, with the company's figures: Universidade do Porto, where Hackian runs continuously on 1,000 critical assets within 5,000; Jumia, with more than 2,600 assets tested; and CEGID, with more than 2,000. The controls a customer has are documented: guardrails written in prose in the test policy, a control to pause or restart a continuous test, an activity log on each test page, and the right to change the severity of a finding and comment on it.

Seen, and not counted yet. Ethiack publishes benchmark results for Hackian against other agents under its EthiBench protocol, with public targets and ground truth, three runs and statistical tests. That meets the rule for Openness 3, but Openness is cumulative and level 2 is not yet evidenced, so the card reads Openness 1 until it is. The challenger also lowered a grey-box credentials page offered as a description of data, a contract clause offered as incident communication, and a target list offered as narrower access: each is a different thing.

What would move it. Autonomy 3: a public page saying how a person takes part while Hackian acts (consulted on exceptions, approving critical decisions, or monitoring within boundaries); the documentation already shows Hackian acting. Openness 2: a page saying what data Hackian processes, keeps or learns from, and under what rules; the docs already name what it does not yet cover alone, such as mobile applications, and the published evaluations would then count. Control 2: a page stating which actions wait for a person's approval and listing what Hackian may reach. Reach: the next unlock the rules name is level 4, others building on Hackian across organisations; the MCP server Ethiack has announced, for outside agents to query findings and trigger tests, is seen and not counted until it is published.

For readers. Ethiack, S.A. is seated at Instituto Pedro Nunes in Coimbra and dates itself to 2022. The marketing figures on the Hackian page, such as the share of PortSwigger labs solved, carry no method and are not counted; the EthiBench results carry one.

What would move it

The one piece of public evidence that would lift each card next:

The agent at work

Examples from public pages that name a customer or give figures. Each source was captured and hashed on the date shown.

Universidade do Porto

Hackian runs continuous testing against the university's external exposure; 1,000 critical assets within 5,000. "Hackian, our agentic AI pentester, runs against U.Porto's exposure 24/7"

Source (captured 2026-11-10T19:44Z, sha256 5b34d184cb10e624)

Jumia

Hackian runs autonomous pentesting across Jumia's external attack surface; more than 2,600 assets tested. "Today Ethiack tests more than 2,600 of its assets."

Source (captured 2026-11-10T10:40Z, sha256 9b8276384a326313)

CEGID

Hackian runs continuous pentesting against more than 2,000 exposed assets across the group. "Hackian runs continuous, autonomous pentesting against more than 2,000 exposed assets"

Source (captured 2026-11-10T10:40Z, sha256 f67604fe918663c6)

ANA Aeroportos

Continuous automated penetration testing of ANA's external attack surface, plus human testing of internal systems. "24/7 automated penetration testing to identify vulnerabilities in ANA’s external attack surface"

Source (captured 2026-11-10T10:40Z, sha256 88229413807b0fed)

The company

The people

Public and professional only, from the company's own pages or a public professional source.

The graph

The company, its people and the stories on the left; each solution, the captured sources behind its card, the indicators those sources evidence and the provisions of the instruments those indicators touch, to the right. "Touched" never means "complies".

people and storiescompanysolutions11 sources12 indicators42 provisions, by instrumentI08: Hackian runs exploitation routines itself to confirm vulnerabilities.I10: In continuous mode Hackian works across the whole in-scope attack surface, not one system.I11: With a Beacon deployed by the customer, Hackian reaches into the customer's internal networks over a tunnel.I20: The documentation states what an Agentic Pentest by Hackian is for.I22: The documentation states a scope limit: test types Hackian does not handle on its own, such as mobile applications, go to human testers.I39: A continuous test page has a control to pause or restart the test; the page gives it for continuous tests only.I41: Each test page carries an activity log of the actions Hackian performs.I47: The customer writes guardrails in the test policy, in prose, stating what the agent must not do.I50: Ethiack publishes its own run of Hackian against other agents under EthiBench, a protocol published on arXiv; the post says Hackian is not in the paper itself.I57: Customers open tickets about the Ethiack platform in its Support Portal, with steps to reproduce and the unexpected outcome; the page does not name Hackian or its findings.S1: A named customer, Universidade do Porto, runs Hackian continuously against its external exposure.S3: The documentation site publishes an llms.txt that resolves and indexes the portal, API and test documentation.EthiackJorge MonteiroAndré BaptistaVítor PinhoJoão FerreiraUniversidade do PortoJumiaCEGIDANA AeroportosHackian (Ethiack's agentic AI pentesting engine)HackianA– · R2 · C1 · O1Continuous Adversarial Exposure ValidationContinuous ValidationAgentic Pentest (Swift, Depth)Agentic PentestExpert PentestExpert PentestEthiack BeaconEthiack BeaconAttack Surface ManagementAttack Surface ManagementEthiack ZeroEthiack Zeroethiack.com/hackiandocs.ethiack.com/docs/portal/test…docs.ethiack.com/docs/portal/surf…docs.ethiack.com/docs/portal/test…docs.ethiack.com/docs/portal/test…docs.ethiack.com/docs/portal/test…docs.ethiack.com/docs/portal/test…ethiack.com/info-hub/research/ai-…docs.ethiack.com/docs/general/sup…ethiack.com/info-hub/case-studies…docs.ethiack.com/llms.txtIt executes actions itselfI08It works across several domains or systemsI10It connects to external tools or services across a trust boundaryI11Its purpose and permitted tasks are stated in writingI20Its limits and known failure cases are documented for those who use itI22There is a way to pause or stop itI39Its actions are loggedI41A limit on it is a rule in proseI47Test or evaluation results are publishedI50There is a channel to report problems with it or contest its outputI57It is in production: a public source names a customer or gives usage figures for what it does on its ownS1It is machine-readable for agents: it publishes an llms.txt, an AGENTS.md, an API description or an agent cardS3Salesforce 8EAAMM 1OWASP 5MCP authorization 2AAGMM 2Microsoft 4NIST AI RMF 16EU AI Act 4Salesforce, Level 2: Simple Orchestration, Single DomainSalesforce, Level 1, how to advance from Level 1 to Level 2Microsoft, 200: Repeatable, Business strategySalesforce, Level 3: Complex Orchestration, Multiple DomainSalesforce, Level 2, how to advance from Level 2 to Level 3Salesforce, Level 3, how to advance from Level 3 to Level 4Microsoft, 400: Capable, Business strategyMicrosoft, 200: Repeatable, Technology and dataOWASP, AT6 Externally Extended AgentNIST AI RMF, GOVERN 6.1NIST AI RMF, MAP 4.1NIST AI RMF, MAP 1.1NIST AI RMF, MAP 2.1NIST AI RMF, MAP 3.3NIST AI RMF, MAP 1.3EU AI Act, Article 13NIST AI RMF, MAP 2.2NIST AI RMF, MEASURE 2.5OWASP, Maturity Level 3 Integrated, Continuous Oversight, key enterprise actionNIST AI RMF, MANAGE 2.4EU AI Act, Article 14OWASP, Maturity Level 0 Unaware and Ad Hoc, key enterprise actionOWASP, Maturity Level 1 Experimentation without Guardrails, key enterprise actionEU AI Act, Article 12AAGMM, GD-03AAGMM, GD-08OWASP, Maturity Level 0 Unaware and Ad Hoc, key enterprise actionNIST AI RMF, MEASURE 2.1NIST AI RMF, MEASURE 2.3EAAMM, Prerequisite, L2 to L3EU AI Act, Article 15NIST AI RMF, MEASURE 1.1NIST AI RMF, MEASURE 3.3NIST AI RMF, GOVERN 5.1Salesforce, Level 1, how to advance from Level 1 to Level 2Salesforce, Level 4, how to maximize valueNIST AI RMF, GOVERN 5.2NIST AI RMF, MAP 1.4Microsoft, 400: Capable, Business strategySalesforce, Level 0, how companies can advance from Level 0 to Level 1MCP authorization, Authorization (draft)MCP authorization, Authorization (draft)

The evidence

SourceReadSHA-256 (first 16)
docs.ethiack.com/docs/general/support-portal2026-11-10T19:44Z96be5f44d0d7b2bf
docs.ethiack.com/docs/portal/surface/configuring-your-beacon2026-11-10T19:44Z84c79566bf725c01
docs.ethiack.com/docs/portal/tests2026-11-10T10:40Z2acbdf55463b1b0f
docs.ethiack.com/docs/portal/tests/agentic-pentest-policy-guidelines2026-11-10T19:44Z544cfd92b23d9220
docs.ethiack.com/docs/portal/tests/agentic-pentests2026-11-10T19:44Zfcb64787931f25ed
docs.ethiack.com/docs/portal/tests/continuous-adversarial-exposure-val2026-11-10T19:44Zee80814e6e113dc5
docs.ethiack.com/docs/portal/tests/human-in-the-loop2026-11-10T19:44Z73a997c1b8b3e142
docs.ethiack.com/docs/portal/tests/test-details2026-11-10T19:44Zae280c9d1654ffba
docs.ethiack.com/llms.txt2026-11-10T19:44Zf0f352298b06ae2a
ethiack.com/2026-11-10T10:40Z61691836f51346e6
ethiack.com/about2026-11-10T10:40Za6b212b51f8a2e09
ethiack.com/hackian2026-11-10T19:44Z5f4cecee0abc3d7a
ethiack.com/info-hub/case-studies/from-checklist-based-pentesting-to-a2026-11-10T10:40Zf67604fe918663c6
ethiack.com/info-hub/case-studies/jumia-continuous-validation2026-11-10T10:40Z9b8276384a326313
ethiack.com/info-hub/case-studies/scaling-security-how-uporto-and-ethi2026-11-10T19:44Z5b34d184cb10e624
ethiack.com/info-hub/case-studies/strengthening-cybersecurity-at-ana-a2026-11-10T10:40Z88229413807b0fed
ethiack.com/info-hub/product/spring-release-20262026-11-10T10:40Z0f29d0bb2dd28ebd
ethiack.com/info-hub/research/ai-pentesting-benchmarks-are-so-bad-we-m2026-11-10T19:44Za80896db5705974d
ethiack.com/legal/security-policy2026-11-10T10:40Zf0b655c59c8ae51d
ethiack.com/legal/terms-of-service2026-11-10T10:40Z0c9e1d67f12a596d
ethiack.com/pricing2026-11-10T10:40Z4ffe2c84147cfcbd

How this report was made

A researcher-assessor gathered and captured the sources and mapped the evidence to indicators, without assigning a level. A challenger argued against every level three and four and every doubtful credit. The deterministic scorer computed the levels and the gate checked the rules. A card appears here only after two rounds of review and a sign-off by agents that did not write it (the team's workflow); Hackian (Ethiack's agentic AI pentesting engine): reviewed in 6 rounds, signed off by gamma.approve@web-summit.dinis on 2026-11-11. A person's sign-off of the series is still to come.

RoleWho
researcher-assessora sub-agent of gamma.studio@web-summit.dinis
challengera sub-agent
scorerbuild/spectrum.mjs
analyst, designer, writergamma.studio@web-summit.dinis
reviewgamma.review@web-summit.dinis, 6 rounds
sign-offgamma.approve@web-summit.dinis, 2026-11-11

The vault

Every capture, the dossier, both assessors' mappings, the challenger's notes and this report's data are in a public sgit vault (1livflie). Read key:

sgit_public_read_d255aac8826ac0704c9059943a1f331cabf3993405f156516329cc8d239d97fd:1livflie

With sgit: sgit clone followed by the key. The key reads; it cannot write.

Corrections

None yet. A correction is made in place, dated here, and carried to the card, the vault and the article.

The article

Hackian on the GAMMA-Ray Spectrum: A– · R2 · C1 · O1, written from this report for PrompTugal.news.