# EU AI Act: Article 15

> GAMMA-Ray v0.0.155 (beta, for review; every rating is experimental). One line item of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (the AI Act), selected articles (aiact.art-15): its text, its place in the source, the indicators that cite it and the evidence that reaches it.
> Page: https://gamma-ray.sgit.ai/provisions/aiact.art-15/ · Source: data/provisions.json


Provision aiact.art-15 · Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (the AI Act), selected articles · article

> Accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity

The text is cited by name, as its licence allows. **In the source:** [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj#art_15](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj#art_15) (the article, by the anchor EUR-Lex gives articles; not checked by fetch, because EUR-Lex does not answer an automated read; linked 2026-11-10). The instrument: [Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (the AI Act), selected articles](../../instruments/index.md), EU law; freely reusable; read 2026-11-10.

## Who cites it

| Indicator | The fact it asks for | Kind of link | The assertion |
|---|---|---|---|
| [`I50`](../../questions/index.md#I50) | Test or evaluation results are published | part: partly evidenced | Asserted in the mapping by gamma-ray@web-summit.dinis; the written basis is not recorded yet. |
| [`I51`](../../questions/index.md#I51) | It is tested for safety and security, including by attack | part: partly evidenced | Asserted in the mapping by gamma-ray@web-summit.dinis; the written basis is not recorded yet. |

A link is our assertion, not the instrument's. "Same" carries the evidence to the provision in full. "Part" marks the provision as partly evidenced: the fact is one piece of what it asks. "Negation" points the other way.

## The evidence that reaches it

| Card | Through | This provision is | The evidence | How far to trust it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Hackian](../../spectrum/cards/ethiack-hackian/index.md) | `I50` | partly evidenced | "our own agent Hackian led on both F1 and recall under the same protocol" [Source](https://ethiack.com/info-hub/research/ai-pentesting-benchmarks-are-so-bad-we-made-a-new-one) | π Moderate · S1·R5·A1 ×3 |
| [Junie](../../spectrum/cards/junie/index.md) | `I50` | partly evidenced | "with 61.6% resolved" [Source](https://blog.jetbrains.com/junie/2026/06/junie-coding-agent-out-of-beta/) | π Moderate · S1·R5·A1 ×3 |
| [Replit Agent](../../spectrum/cards/replit-agent/index.md) | `I51` | partly evidenced | "continuously probes and tests the AI Agent for safety and security boundaries" [Source](https://replit.com/security) | π Moderate · S1·R5·A1 ×3 |

Touched never means complies.

## Answer it directly

A company can answer this line item itself, in its own file at `/.well-known/fact-ray.json`, with the node `gamma-ray:provision/aiact.art-15` ([how](../../fact-ray/well-known/index.md)). A company that already assesses itself against EU AI Act can reuse that work.

[All provisions](../../provisions/index.md)